E espanca j e l
89,510 99%
há 7 anos
,jpeg/005/566/728/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/001/435/270/1280x720.7.jpg)
,jpeg/009/500/363/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/002/580/630/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/003/891/792/v2/320x180.205.jpg)
,jpeg/004/683/840/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/006/608/316/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/013/366/510/1280x720.8.jpg)
,jpeg/017/143/634/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/007/042/263/v2/320x180.222.jpg)
,jpeg/016/041/368/1280x720.3.jpg)
Comentários
9
What is it about those long-legged panty girdles that look so unglamorous & old-fashioned but yet sexy at the same time?? Partly because of how form-fitting they are. And because they are so full coverage, when they do get pulled down it makes the bare ass seem that much more . . . well, BARE. They make the wearer look conservative and straight-laced, so the humiliation factor is increased when the lady is stripped or spanked. And the way they hobble the legs when pulled down in conjunction with high heels -- it makes the "walk of shame" over to the corner more awkward for the bare-assed ladies.
As far as I know, this is the one and only time Ed made use of the split-screen technique. I'd love to have made them look directly at the camera, especially as their girdles were coming down, and made them react, either verbally or non-verbally, to the reality of their bottoms being bared, and add a mental dimension of domination and humiliation to the scene. (and, by what privilege do they get to keep their tops on, or their frontal elements anonymous?) The second model appears to be one of the few from a different ethnicity than Caucasian, would have loved to know a little more about both of them. But, with Ed, you know exactly what to expect, and rarely leave disappointed!
